For Christmas I got an interesting present from a pal - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few easy prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and really amusing in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty design of writing, however it's also a bit repeated, and very verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, given that pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source large language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can order any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in anybody's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, produced by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered even more.

He wants to widen his variety, creating various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are talking about data here, we really mean human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and setiathome.berkeley.edu The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for innovative functions must be prohibited, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without consent need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective but let's construct it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - of the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize creators' material on the internet to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and an entire lot of happiness," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its finest carrying out markets on the vague guarantee of growth."

A government spokesperson stated: "No move will be made until we are absolutely confident we have a practical plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them accredit their content, access to high-quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for right holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a nationwide information library containing public information from a wide variety of sources will also be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector required to share details of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less regulation.

This comes as a number of claims against AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their permission, and asteroidsathome.net used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of factors which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector forums.cgb.designknights.com is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it should be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the many downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a portion of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, drapia.org Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It is complete of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to check out in parts since it's so long-winded.

But given how quickly the tech is progressing, bphomesteading.com I'm not sure how long I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.